As cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, understanding the techniques employed by adversaries is crucial for effective defense. One such technique highlighted by the MITRE ATT&CK framework is Process Injection (T1055). In this blog post, we'll delve into what Process Injection entails, provide real-world examples, discuss mitigation strategies, and explore detection methods.

Understanding Process Injection

Process Injection (T1055) is a stealthy technique used by adversaries to inject malicious code into a legitimate process, thereby hiding the presence of malicious activity and evading detection by security mechanisms. By injecting code into a trusted process, attackers can bypass security controls and execute malicious actions with the privileges of the targeted process.

>Examples:

1. DLL Injection: Attackers may inject a malicious Dynamic Link Library (DLL) into a legitimate process to execute malicious code. Once injected, the malicious DLL can intercept system calls, steal sensitive information, or perform other malicious activities while masquerading as part of the legitimate process.
2. Process Hollowing: In this technique, adversaries create a new process in a suspended state and replace its memory with malicious code, effectively hollowing out the legitimate process. Once resumed, the hollowed process executes the malicious code, which can be used to bypass detection and execute unauthorized actions on the system.

Mitigation Strategies:

To mitigate the risk posed by Process Injection attacks, organizations can implement the following strategies:

1. Endpoint Protection: Deploy endpoint protection solutions capable of detecting and blocking Process Injection techniques. Utilize advanced anti-malware and intrusion prevention systems to identify suspicious process behavior and prevent unauthorized code injection.
2. Application Whitelisting: Implement application whitelisting to control which processes and DLLs are allowed to execute on endpoints. By maintaining a whitelist of trusted applications and libraries, organizations can prevent unauthorized code injection and restrict the execution of unapproved software.
3. Least Privilege Principle: Follow the principle of least privilege by limiting the permissions granted to processes and users. Restricting unnecessary privileges can mitigate the impact of Process Injection attacks and prevent adversaries from gaining unauthorized access to critical system resources.

Detection Methods:

Detecting Process Injection attacks requires proactive monitoring and robust detection capabilities. Some effective detection methods include:

1. Behavioral Analysis: Monitor process behavior for anomalies indicative of Process Injection techniques. Look for signs such as unexpected process creations, modifications to process memory, or abnormal network activity associated with known malicious processes.
2. Memory Integrity Monitoring: Implement memory integrity monitoring solutions to detect unauthorized changes to process memory, which may indicate Process Injection attempts. Monitor for changes in memory permissions, unexpected memory allocations, or signs of code injection within legitimate processes.
3. Log Analysis: Analyze system logs, such as Windows Event Logs or syslog data, for entries related to process creation, termination, or modification. Look for anomalies or suspicious activities that may signal potential Process Injection attacks, such as failed process creations, unexpected process terminations, or unusual process relationships.

In conclusion, understanding and mitigating the risk of Process Injection (T1055) is crucial for enhancing an organization's cybersecurity posture. By implementing robust mitigation strategies, leveraging advanced detection methods, and maintaining a proactive approach to security, organizations can better defend against these types of attacks and protect their critical assets and data from malicious actors. Stay vigilant, stay secure.

Most Common MITRE Att&ck Techniques